Use any LLM. Expose zero PII.

Sensitive records reach no model. Full AI output reaches your team.

Your compliance team blocked LLM deployment. Presential unblocks it. We transform PII into contextually equivalent fiction before inference and restore it on return. Models reason on realistic data. Real data never leaves your network.

See the Benchmark Data
500,000 test cases9 foundation models100% reversal accuracy45-90ms overheadFull methodology published
presential: inference round-trip
awaiting input
PERSONSarah Mitchell
ADDRESS42 Pembroke Gardens, Kensington
AMOUNT£12,450
ACCOUNT72849163
DOB14/09/1985
ORGMeridian Bank
REGULATORFCA
JURISDICTIONGB
The Problem

The model is not the bottleneck. Your data pipeline is.

Every regulated organisation runs the same programme. Build a pilot. Feed it sanitised data. Watch it underperform. Kill it. Repeat. The bottleneck is never the model. It is the data you refuse to send because you should not.

80%

of regulated AI pilots stall before production, blocked by data governance, not model capability.

78%

of banking executives name data privacy as their top GenAI barrier (EY, 2024).

96.2% vs 41.3%

Presential RSP versus traditional masking. Tested across 500,000 regulated cases and nine foundation models.

Why Existing Approaches Fail

Masking kills accuracy. The data proves it.

Every regulated organisation tries masking first. Replace names with [NAME-1], addresses with [ADDRESS-1], amounts with [AMOUNT-1]. The model receives placeholders. It returns unusable output. The project stalls within a week. The bottleneck is not the model. Masking destroys the context the model needs to reason. Presential preserves it.

Placeholder Masking

Data In, Usefulness Out

> [NAME-1] of [ADDRESS-1]
> disputes [AMOUNT-1] on [ACCOUNT-1]
2.3× quality degradation

The model receives no names, no addresses, no monetary values. It produces generic, operationally useless responses littered with placeholders that require manual reconstruction.

Tokenisation

Opaque Identifiers, Zero Utility

> TKN_7f2c of TKN_d4a8
> disputes TKN_4f06 on TKN_e0ca
Zero semantic utility

The LLM processes nonsense and returns nonsense. You have burned inference costs and learned nothing.

Reversible Semantic Pseudonymisation

Real Context, Safe Data

> David Whitmore of 17 Rosemary Lane
> disputes £9,870 on 31590274
Within 5% of raw data baseline

Identifying entities become fictitious but realistic. The model reasons on full context. Every entity reverses on return.

DIY (Regex + NER)

Brittle Rules, Perpetual Maintenance

// Regex catches "Sarah Mitchell"
// but misses "S. Mitchell",
// "Ms Mitchell", "the client"
60-70% entity recall (typical)

Pattern-matching catches the obvious cases and misses everything else. Contextual references, co-references, novel formats. Every new data source means new rules. You are building a maintenance liability, not infrastructure.

How It Works

Sits between your data and the LLM. Nothing bypasses it.

Enterprise Systems
CRM · Core Banking · Claims
Real PII ↓
↑ Restored
Presential RSP
Transform · Relay · Reverse
Pseudonymised Data ↓
↑ AI Response
Any LLM
Claude · GPT · Gemini · Mistral

Deploys on-premises or in your VPC. Your data is transformed before it crosses any network boundary. The LLM only ever sees pseudonymised content.

Interactive Demo

See it work

Type
Original
Pseudonymised
PERSON
Sarah Mitchell
ADDRESS
42 Pembroke Gardens, Kensington
AMOUNT
£12,450
ACCOUNT
72849163
DOB
14/09/1985
ORG
Meridian Bank
REGULATOR
FCA
JURISDICTION
GB
Benchmark Data

500K test cases. Nine models. Full methodology.

Summarisation Accuracy

Raw data (baseline)100%
Presential RSP96.2%
Placeholder masking41.3%
Tokenisation12.8%

BLEU / ROUGE-L composite · 500 financial services test cases · methodology on request

System Performance

Transformation latency45-90ms
Entity classification50+ types
Reversal accuracy100%
Confidence gate≥ 95%

Fail-closed: entities below confidence threshold are redacted, never passed through

What this means for your team

Complaint summarisation

A model summarising a financial complaint needs names, amounts, dates, and account references to produce useful output. Placeholder masking strips all of these. Presential replaces them with fictitious equivalents. The summary reads naturally. Every entity reverses on return. Your team gets actionable output, not a redacted mess.

Claims triage

An LLM triaging an insurance claim needs claimant details, policy context, and incident specifics. Tokenisation replaces these with opaque IDs and produces garbage output. Presential preserves the full semantic structure. The model triages accurately. Your claims team ships faster.

Clinical note analysis

A model extracting insights from clinical notes needs patient context to identify relevant findings. Presential pseudonymises patient identifiers while preserving medical context, diagnostic codes, and temporal relationships. Clinicians get useful AI output without exposing patient data.

In 2024, a single breach in financial services averaged 4.45 million dollars in direct costs (IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report). For a UK-regulated firm, ICO enforcement can reach 17.5 million pounds or 4% of global turnover. Both figures assume data left the network. Presential removes that assumption.

Why Now

The EU AI Act and DORA are live. Data governance is no longer optional.

The regulatory window for informal AI experimentation has closed. EU AI Act high-risk requirements are in force. DORA operational resilience mandates are live across UK and EU financial services. The FCA’s AI guidance names third-party inference risk as an active compliance consideration. Your compliance team is reading the rules correctly. The question is whether you build LLM data governance from scratch or deploy infrastructure that already meets the standard.

Jan 2025

DORA operational resilience mandates live (UK and EU)

Feb 2025

EU AI Act: prohibited AI practices provisions apply

Aug 2026

EU AI Act: full high-risk system requirements in force

Capabilities

What your CISO will ask. Already answered.

Data Never Leaves Your Network

Transformation happens on-premises or in your VPC. Only the fiction reaches the LLM provider. You control the perimeter.

45 to 90ms. Your SLAs Hold.

The transformation layer adds negligible overhead. Inference time dominates. Your latency commitments stay unchanged.

Fail-Closed by Design

If the system cannot classify an entity with high confidence, it redacts rather than passes. No silent failures. No silent leakage.

Every Transformation Is Logged

SHA-256 verification. Full audit trail. Designed for EU AI Act, DORA, FCA/PRA, and sector supervisory reviews. Your compliance team can verify every operation.

Switch Models Without Rewriting Your Governance

Works with Anthropic Claude, OpenAI GPT, Google Gemini, Mistral, or your own fine-tuned models. Your data governance layer survives model changes.

Understands Context, Not Just Keywords

50+ entity types: names, addresses, accounts, amounts, dates, and the relationships between them. Context-aware classification means fewer false redactions and better LLM output.

Proven

Trusted in regulated environments

Tier-1 UK Bank

Reduced LLM deployment approval timeline from 9 months to 6 weeks.

FTSE 250 Insurer

Moved claims summarisation from pilot to production in 8 weeks.

NHS Trust

Achieved IG Toolkit compliance for clinical AI in 4 weeks.

Currently piloting with Tier-1 UK financial institutions. Case studies available on request.

Model Agnostic: Works With Any LLM Provider

Anthropic Claude
OpenAI GPT
Google Gemini
Mistral AI
Meta Llama
Fine-Tuned Models
Compliance

Your compliance team gets evidence, not assurances

Audit-ready from day one. Every transformation is logged with SHA-256 verification. When the FCA, PRA, or ICO asks what happened to which data, you have the answer.

Built against EU AI Act (high-risk system transparency), DORA (operational resilience), FCA/PRA supervisory requirements, GDPR (data protection by design), and SOC 2 controls. Not retrofitted. Built in.

Your team can inspect the methodology, review the classification rules, and verify what gets redacted and why. No black boxes.

EU AI Act
High-risk system transparency
DORA
Operational resilience
FCA / PRA
Supervisory evidence
GDPR
Data protection by design
SOC 2
Framework aligned
UK Deep Tech. Published Openly.
The methodology is published. No black box. No vendor gatekeeping.
Live in Tier-1 UK Bank Environments
Not a concept. Not a slide deck. Live in regulated production environments.
Built by Enterprise AI Leaders
The team shipped AI infrastructure at scale in financial services.

Production is not a model problem. It is a trust problem.

Presential is the infrastructure layer between your data and every AI model. Move from pilot to production without compromising on what your security, compliance, and infrastructure teams require.

Request a Briefing